Free Technology Newsletters
» All 33 InfoWorld Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily
 
InfoWorld
 
   

Sneakwrapped Medical Forms

By Ed Foster, Section The Gripelog
Posted on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 12:06:50 AM PDT

We are all increasingly inured to the daily assaults various institutions make on our rights and privacy through the sneakwrap terms in their forms, mail stuffers, warranties, monthly statements, etc. But some medical patients in one metropolis that will remain nameless are just a little safer today from such outrages because of one reader who read the fine print, took the time to think about it, and then said no.


Like many of us of a certain age, the reader had been told by his doctor that a colonoscopy was in order. "Included with my preparation information was a one-page form from a genetics institute that I'd never heard of asking for my family's medical regarding several types of cancer," the reader wrote. "OK, even as a layman, I can understand how such information might be pertinent to this procedure. The form also asked for my name, date of birth, address, phone number, and Social Security number. Then near the bottom it said:

By submitting this form to your physician ... you agree to the possibility that you may be contacted to discuss the opportunity for a clinical consultation at (the genetics institute)."

This legalese suggesting he was entering some kind of contract involving very sensitive personal information - not just of his own but of his entire family - brought the reader up short. "Wait a minute -- by submitting medical information that the doctor apparently requires, I have to agree to enter a relationship with some organization I don't know? At the very least, I need to understand what they are going to be doing with this information and what their privacy practices are. Now, I might be perfectly willing to participate in medical research if that's what this is. But I would like to be asked, not tricked into it by some shrinkwrap-like agreement. I'm disappointed that the medical profession is apparently stooping to the level of the software industry."

The more the reader thought about the form (along with all the worries and stresses of prepping for a colonosocpy), the less he liked it. "Why would they need my Social Security number?" he wondered. "Is this a genuine request for medical information or some kind of marketing thing or even an identity theft scam? To have my SSN, date of birth and all this other information on a form that will be passed from hand to hand around a hospital and who knows what other organizations is VERY questionable."

The reader decided not to submit the form. "Thankfully, there was no grief about not returning the form -- nobody at the hospital even asked about it," the reader wrote. "The hospital experience itself was actually better than I could have hoped for, and the results look good. After I got home, I did a little checking and discovered that the genetics center is indeed connected to the hospital, so I decided to write them a letter explaining my concerns about their form."

For his trouble, the reader got a rather sanctimonious response. "Out of the ~4000 forms we have received back, you are the first to raise these questions," the genetics institute wrote him back, saying the purpose of the form was to screen for genetic counseling, not for research as the reader had guessed. "For people who provide a family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome, a letter is sent directly to the individual and referring physician ... suggesting a referral to us. The reason we ask for DOB and SSN is that there are a number of patients who have the same name and DOB, which means the only other discriminator between two people would be SSN (we do not rely on address or phone numbers as people move all the time). The reason we have the wording at the bottom is due to HIPAA issues. Since we have no relationship to the person filling out the form, we need to make sure that (s)he agree to have us contact them if needed."

HIPAA, one of the few federal privacy laws we have with real teeth, does indeed put some restrictions on how patient information is handled. But there are no provisions in it mandating that patients be kept in the dark as to who their information is being given to and for what purposes. If anything, the real HIPAA issues with a form like this would be whether the hospital fulfilled its legal obligations to inform the reader why he was being asked for this information, or to make it clear that is was not mandatory he provide it.

"Of the approximately 4,000 responses that you have received, how many people genuinely knew that, simply by giving the form to their doctor, they were agreeing to your contact?" the reader wrote back to the genetics center. "The form is provided to patients in a potentially extremely stressful situation, and its inclusion with the instructions implies that it is a REQUIREMENT of the procedure. The form should state clearly at its tops that it is an invitation to participate, and that it is NOT required for the patient's colonoscopy. The form should NOT include information other than name, address and telephone number. You chose to use the Social Security Number as a convenient mechanism to uniquely identify a participant -- but there are other ways to do so. You could, for example, sequentially number the forms before they are sent."

To a degree, at least, that seems to have done the trick. "My second letter to the hospital where my colonoscopy was done got results," the reader wrote me a few days later after getting a second response from the genetic counseling center. "It sounds like they will incorporate what I considered to be my most salient concerns by making the voluntary nature of the form clear and only using the last four digits of the Social Security number. Still, I wonder how many people at the hospital, the genetics institute, and maybe elsewhere can see the information on those forms? How is it stored and how is it protected? To me, this just serves as a warning that we all need to be extremely vigilant in all facets of our lives."

Indeed. When I decided not to identify the hosptial -- my own form of medical privacy policy, I guess -- I googled the sneakwrap language in their genetic center's form to make sure it wouldn't be too easy to figure out who they were that way. No chance -- the by-sumbitting-this-form-you-agree kind of wording is in to be found in all manner of medical documents all over the place. Hopefully the context isn't always quite as scary as with this example, but a little more vigilance from all of us is just what the doctor ordered.

Post your comments about this story below or write Ed Foster at Foster@gripe2ed.com.

< A Genuine Microsoft Mistake | Terms of Ridicule >


Display: Sort:
Sneakwrapped Medical Forms | 7 comments (7 topical) | Post A Comment
Majority ususally wrong[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous User on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 10:20:35 AM PDT

4000 forms, and this is the first time it was questioned. Those are the same 4000 that signed adjustable mortgages without reading the fine print. I had been going to a beauty college for haircuts. Recently they had a new form where I waived all rights to ANYTHING that could happen. I said I was happy to agree to a bad haircut in the sake of helping poor students, but if I was electrocuted in their chair due to faulty wiring, that was a little too much to waive. Sorry, the manager said. No signature, no haircut. So - no haircut. I went elsewhere. I called the owner to say why I wouldn't be coming back. She said I was the first to question the form (surprise!), but I wouldn't need to sign it for a haircut. Only for other procedures such as hair frying or whatever they do to women's hair these days. But I still haven't been back. I guess I'm not very forgiving. I still won't ever go back to TurboTax, either.

[ Reply to This ]


The WHO matters to us.[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#7)
by Rey on Tue May 06, 2008 at 04:02:54 PM PDT

Does anyone else cringe when reading things like, "one metropolis that will remain nameless" and "I googled the sneakwrap language in their genetic center's form to make sure it wouldn't be too easy to figure out who they were?" Here's someone uncovering a problem - that's good! - and doing something about it - that's good too! - but selfishly covering up the perps so only he will know. That's bad. Arrogant selfishness is bad per se, and shielding perps is one reason the country is over-run with perps today. Please give us ALL the relevant facts, WHO included. You'd be surprised at how good it feels to practice courage. Reybo
Rey in Virginia
[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Medical forms[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#2)
by rrosen on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 10:49:53 AM PDT

Bravo to the person for questioning the form, especially given the environment. And for following up. Wish more people would do that (including myself).

[ Reply to This ]


Another Consideration...[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#3)
by Anonymous User on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 11:01:47 AM PDT

While your doctor may not mis-use your medical history, there may be nothing to prevent this genetics organization from passing on your medical history to something like the Medical Information Bureau (MIB). While the intent of the MIB is to prevent insurance fraud and reduce risk to the insurance companies, I suspect that they are looking to mine more and more data to assist in developing underwriting models that exclude coverage for certain conditions and histories. Giving up your SSN to a genetics organization, along with an extensive medical history (where you may be more honest in the interest of "research") could put an individual at some risk for coverage denial or rate increases. I don't want to go all black helicopter here, but it does concern me when information agregators start getting hold of medical information. If you think you have trouble with your credit scores and identity theft, imagine if you couldn't get insurance because someone messed with your medical history or the wrong test result was reported -- or simply because a bean counter assigned a higher risk to you because a genetics institute reported your history.

[ Reply to This ]


Similar experience with same specialty[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#4)
by Anonymous User on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 02:37:56 PM PDT

I went in to the same type of Doctor recently and was in a great deal of pain. This Doctor had performed my last colonoscopy. While filling out the forms that seem to be required every time you visit the Doctor even if you have seen them before I was asked for my Driver's License so that they could make a copy. I had just completed the forms that included my SS#, DOB, etc. Now they wanted this photo copy. I had to threaten to leave the office before the receptionis relented and made the photo copy in front of me and proceded to crop the black and white picture out to attach to the file and let me keep the rest of the photo copy. I suggested that perhaps they could inform the patients that they need a picture rather than insisting on making a photo copy of such a sesnitive document. Of course I was I was the first person to have grief with this. I think being an IT profesional may have something to do with our sensitivety level with this sort of thing.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Some info for doctors is for credit, not health [ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#5)
by Anonymous User on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 08:37:15 PM PDT

The reason that doc's offices want alot of the info is for pursuing your bill versus health info. Why do they need multiple contact numbers and relatives info for simple exams or visits for a common cold? They want to be able to track you down if you default on the bill.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


The reason is simple[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#6)
by LasVegan on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 08:57:57 PM PDT

It's not that they want a duplicate of the information that you already filled out. What they want is ID to confirm that you are really the person you claim you are, not some impostor using somebody else's health insurance. If there was some question in the future the photocopied ID would show that they had confirmed that you were really you. What's your DL got that they didn't already get off your forms, other than your picture? (And the captcha: What do you mean, are you saying Lemon isn't a car??? <G>)

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Sneakwrapped Medical Forms | 7 comments (7 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:
Recent Entries
Suing Sony
0 comments

Apple Leaves Hawaiian Investor in the Cold
2 comments

Riding the Autorenewal Express
8 comments

Comcast Gets Nominated for Worst ToS
4 comments

Taxing Software Experiences
12 comments

Terms of Ridicule
8 comments

More The Gripelog...

Submit a gripe
About the Author
Email Ed Foster

Help Ed and his readers build these projects:
The Gripewiki
The EULA Library

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Live Gripes
Has AOL Changed Their Ways?
4 comments

A Nestle SweeTarts Conspiracy
15 comments

AT&T Kills "Bad" Username
12 comments

DESPERATE! AOL HAS TAKEN OVER MY COMPUTER
28 comments

parkingticket.com SCAM on refunds
30 comments

Don't let Net Enforcers Ruin Your Day.
16 comments

More Live Gripes...

Sign up for my newsletter

To have my column automatically e-mailed to you, submit your email address in the form below. Of course, I will not turn your address over to any other party or send you any unrequested e-mail.

Infoworld Blogs

Recomended Sites
The AFFECT Coalition
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Free Software Foundation
HearUsNow.org
Public Knowledge
StopBadware.org

Jeff Angus
Ben Edelman
Dan Gillmor
Bob Lewis
Brian Livingston
Freedom to Tinker
Lawmeme
PC World's Techlog
SunBeltSoftware Blog
Troubleshootsers.com

Rss Feeds
How this works
 Top News 
 Columnists 
 Tech Watch 
 Test Center Reviews 
 Applications 
 App Development 
 E-Business Solutions & Strategies 
 End-user Hardware 
 Networking 
 Operating Systems 
 Platforms 
 Security 
 Standards & Protocols 
 Storage 
 Telecommunications 
 Wireless 
 Web Services 

 

create account | faq | search