Free Technology Newsletters
» All 33 InfoWorld Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily
 
InfoWorld
 
   

One man's answer to big oil

By Rey, Section Live Gripes
Posted on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:04:50 PM PDT
I'm just an ordinary retired guy in Virginia you never heard of who's had enough. It's time to do something about Big Oil.

Gasoline has been pushed to over $3 a gallon in most of the US this year due to the cost of oil. Every mile we drive or fly, every mile an 18-wheeler travels delivering goods, every watt of electricity generated from oil by the power company, national defense, medicine, every bit of plastic to wrap anything else in, each uses petrochemicals and cost more.

Everyone in the chain of manufacture and sales can pass the added costs along. The only ones with no one to pass the costs to are you and me. We are the ones the others pass them to. We reimburse everybody. Who do we see about this?

We can't expect anything but spin tokenism from the Bush-Cheney administration. Those families have been part of the oil industry since long before these men ran for office. We knew that all along.

We can't expect help from the best Congress money can buy. Someone can, just not us.

We can only do something about price gouging and excess profits ourselves. We can make intelligent choices. Here's who I'm not buying from.

Exxon-Mobil Corporation announced on April 27 that it had $86 billion income in the first three months of 2006, and that $6.9 billion was profit. There's probably a good reason for this. They may even be entitled to it. Wall Street was disappointed it was so little. I don't care.

Exxon-Mobil is the largest company in the U.S. as ranked on the Fortune 500 list. It's also the largest publicly traded oil and gas company in the world. And it's the most profitable. Its operating profit in 2005 was $36.13 billion, an all-time record for any publicly traded company, replacing Wal-Mart as the world's largest corporation by revenue.

Who does Exxon-Mobil blame for high oil prices? Car makers. John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute notes that, referring to a recent Exxon Mobil ad that blamed auto companies for the rising price of gas, Chrysler chief spokesman Jason Vines said:

"Despite a documented history of blowing their exorbitant profits on outlandish executive salaries and stock buybacks, and hoarding their bounty by avoiding technologies, policies, and legislation that would protect the population and environment and lower fuel costs, Big Oil insists on transferring all of that responsibility on the auto companies."

Which could explain why US auto companies are losing billions while Exxon-Mobil is making them.

Exxon-Mobil is regarded by many environmentalists as an example of corporate irresponsibility and disregard for environmental concerns. The company has been a target of a number of campaigns by Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, and People and Planet.

In 1989 the tanker Exxon Valdez spilled approximately 10 million gallons of oil into the waters of Alaska's Prince William Sound, the most devastating oil spill of all time in U.S. waters. 34,000 people, most of them touched by the fisheries industry, were harmed by that spill. In 1995 a court fined Exxon $5 billion in damages. How much has the company paid? Zero. Exxon has been working the legal system all it can filing appeals and delays.

This is a bad corporate citizen, one of the worst. For window dressing they donate a smidgen of their monster profits to charitable causes. A little here for Little League, a little there for the opera company. It gives them something cheerful to blurt about in full-color, full-page magazine ads.

Expensive ads are a powerful influence on magazine and newspaper publishers not to take a hard look at a generous supporter like Exxon-Mobil. That's the American Way. You don't have a magazine. I don't have a newspaper. We have no reason to look the other way. Except that we were taught to turn the other cheek when we encounter abuse.

Abusive companies like Exxon-Mobil act like we have no end of cheeks to turn. I've reached the end, and now is when I stop supporting Exxon-Mobil. There's nothing special about their gasoline. There are plenty of other filling stations with fuel of the same quality. In fact the two best German car companies say other brands have better additives, but that's not the issue here.

The issue is that for the rest of 2006, none of the four cars in my family will be gassed up at stations selling Exxon-Mobil products.

I hope you do the same for a company you choose. I hope you send this email to everyone you know. If enough people in America have backbones, and that's a big IF, our monster corporations might learn there are limits to the corporate abuse we will tolerate.

Or maybe there aren't any limits for you? That's your decision.

Nothing is without fallout. It's unfortunate that filling station operators must suffer but ordinary people have no power except individual choice. We can support the operators with car repairs and other automotive needs.

You can expect to read newspaper stories attacking this idea, and the news channels will chatter. That's why corporations have public relations departments. Enjoy it; ignore it.


< ecost.com return policy (hard to find, bad for the customer) | VCOM System Suite 6 Professional >


Display: Sort:
One man's answer to big oil | 12 comments (12 topical) | Post A Comment
How about just using less oil?[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#1)
by Matthew Cervi on Mon May 01, 2006 at 08:31:25 AM PDT

You said "I hope you do the same for a company you choose"...so if you boycott Exxon and start buying more and Shell and I boycott Shell and start buying more at Exxon then we haven't accomplished anything have we?

The oil industry's profits may be high, even excessive, but as long as demand exceeds supply we have only ourselves to blame.  With China's economy ramping up I see no end for the demand for oil and the supply is finite.

A year ago we traded my wife's minivan (18mpg) in for a Prius (~48mpg) and it was one of the best decisions we ever made.  Come the end of the year when my lease expires on my BMW (28mpg) I'm going to get a Honda Fit (~38mpg).  I figure every little bit of lower consumption helps reduce demand and has the bonus of insulating me from higher prices.

[ Reply to This ]



What is this...[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#2)
by Anonymous User on Tue May 02, 2006 at 06:40:20 AM PDT

"As long as the demand exceeds supply" crap I keep hearing about oil? Yes, we consume tons of oil, but I've seen NO signs of actual shortages, the gas stations never seem to run out, and if they do, the truck is less than an hour away from delivery, so it's not a "supply vs. demand issue". The oil companies should not be making records profits while the citizens are being squeezed to death.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Think globally[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#3)
by Matthew Cervi on Tue May 02, 2006 at 11:49:09 AM PDT

Sure, we don't often run out here in the US (I actually have seen shortages after Hurricane Katrina and currently during the ethanol phase-in), but I suspect poorer countries end up with shortages of gas.

It is simple economics.  If I have 10 widgets and 9 people want to buy them I need to lower my price to attract more buyers.  Likewise if I have 10 widgets but 12 customers, I can raise my prices to find the 10 most willing customers.  The two that don't/can't buy see a shortage.  In this case the US, with plenty of money relatively speaking, doesn't see shortages.

I'm not defending the size of the oil companies' profits (personally I'm more bothered by their executive compensation), but merely pointing out one reason why prices are increasing and how I chose to reduce my exposure that.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]



Avoiding one company not useful[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#4)
by wagnert on Thu May 04, 2006 at 09:26:47 AM PDT

You talk about avoiding Exxon/Mobile and using other gasoline station.  However, that won't actually work since many of the off brands also sell you gasoline produced by Exxon/Mobile, or Shell, or any of the major gasoline producers.  You may avoid the Exxon or Mobile gas station but still be buying Exxon/Mobile gasoline.

[ Reply to This ]


Exxon Valdez[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#5)
by Anonymous User on Mon May 22, 2006 at 09:58:43 PM PDT

The Exxon Valdez oil spill was years and years ago, apparently caused mostly by negligence on the part of the captain. Exxon spent a lot of money cleaning up the spill. Of course they are going to fight a $5 billion judgment.

[ Reply to This ]


Biodiesel and hydrogen[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#6)
by Anonymous User on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 05:57:57 PM PDT

Look on the bright side... In the past, biodiesel never took off as a commercially available fuel because it was too expensive, at about $3 per gallon. But in many areas, gasoline prices are well past the $3 mark (in my own hometown, $3.20 is not uncommon for the cheapest gas). So the oil companies *can't* let the price get too far above $3 a gallon, or people will be motivated to buy vehicles fueled by things the oil companies don't make money off of. The really magic number though, is $4.50 per gallon; At that point, hydrogen would be equal in cost to gasoline, and you'd likely see quite a few people switching...something the oil companies cannot allow.

[ Reply to This ]


One other solution - Use your power to choose[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#7)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jul 18, 2006 at 07:22:31 PM PDT

As hard or impossible as it seems, a great percentage of Americans can take reasonable public transportation. Reasonable being that it doesn't double your commute time or involves numerous transfers. In my case, as in hundreds of thousands, it means getting up earlier and taking a train, then a shuttle or bus. It adds 15-20 minutes eachway but if that's all I can do to reduce demand, it's not bad. The effect on oil/gas producing companies would be instantaneious by corporate measure. It reduces their profits, reduce pollution, less wear on vehicles and us. Vote on Republican or Democrat lines? How about vote for us - make it an issue as big as tax hikes, stay informed, monitor your senators and representatives. We actually do have a way to "pass on the cost" - even the taxes we pay for public transportation will pay for themselves if we make better commuting choices. And I'm not advocating "don't fill up for a day" that's NO help. Using available public transportation, you'll fill up once a week or twice a month. If enough people take public transportation for a month or two each year I'm willing to bet we won't see Exxon or any of the oil/gas goliaths reporting record profits. Their executives just may have to scale down. Gee, breaks my heart.

[ Reply to This ]


Bring down prices at the Pump[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#8)
by Anonymous User on Fri Jul 28, 2006 at 09:44:34 AM PDT

Since we can't socialize Energy lets do the next best thing.Remember TVA, Hoover Dam, etc? Lets see a congressman have the backbone to propose this idea: Lets take the Military Out of Reach of these corporate Vampires. Have the Army Corps of Eng. Drill and refine fuel for the military. That should ease demand and drive down the price of oil by the energy companies own logic in their propaganda. It would be worth the tax dollars invested for the return in savings at the pump. In addition lets go farther, Lets Regulate the industry first and then go with this idea. I can't wait to see the oil lobby panic and LOL at this idea on here that will work. Bring it on. We see through you.

[ Reply to This ]


Speculation[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#9)
by Anonymous User on Mon Jul 31, 2006 at 08:15:00 AM PDT

Personally, I find it difficult to believe that the current price of oil is justified on any sort of supply/demand basis.

Oil is 4 times more expensive now than 15 years ago (wholesale price). You say there's war in Iraq/Afganistan/Lebanon? I say, when was there not war and unrest in the Middle East? Lebanon and Afganistan aren't even major oil producers.

You say China is growing? China has been growing for years. Before that it was South Korea, Thailand and the other "Little Asian Tiger" economies. Before that it was Japan.

I think that trading and speculation make up a significant part of the current price of oil.

Remember how, in the late 1990's, there was an electricity shortage on the West Coast of the US? Remember how it eventually came out that certain Enron electricity futures traders had a lot to do with the high prices associated with that shortage?

As I recall, recordings of internal conversations between traders became public. They were joking about "scr*wing grandmothers out of their pensions". I'll wager that something similar is going on now, somewhere on a trading exchange. Think London, Chicago, Houston, New York, that kind of thing.

Whether or not we ever become privy to the actual private conversations about it is another matter. Real insight is rare.

[ Reply to This ]



the price of oil[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#10)
by Anonymous User on Mon Aug 21, 2006 at 12:59:21 PM PDT

1. oil is cheaper than water - just check what a gallon of bottled water costs you 2. excess oil consumption is destroying our environment and our balance of payment and financing our enemies. 3. higher prices reduce consumption, thus improving the environment at least. 4. higher prices encourge consumers to buy more reasonable cars getting better mileage, reducing freeway carnage and helping the environment 5. higher prices encourage consumers to demand mass transit that actually goes where they need to go - right now, in many west coast cities at least, any semblance of mass transit barely rises to the level of pathetic - it can take longer to use mass transit than to walk (I've tested this when my car was damaged) 6. though I drive a fair amount, I would support a $5 per gallon tax on gassoline to be used to fund mass transit, renewable energy, etc. This will have a compounding and beneficial effect. But given the scum in the whitehouse, this won't happen, I am sure.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


This is Matt--Reply to Rey's portion...[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#12)
by Anonymous User on Sat Sep 02, 2006 at 04:44:56 AM PDT

I have been really thinking about the effective "How Tos" of organizing an effective boycott. I have concluded that [as mentioned by Rey]...you can only single out ONE at a time, as we (US)...are a "okay I will deal with SOME inconvenience for a good cause, but not TOO much" society!! I have decided to purchase boycottbiggestoil.com [or similar-type name], post factual information and the "target" on the homepage. This would let people know WHO was being boycotted EXCLUSIVELY that fiscal quarter. This company would be chosen on the basis of the one that posts the highest previous quarter PROFITS....not earnings....as I figure this is the truest measure of excess. I also envision on "on deck" company that is next up to face the boycott...that is showing the second highest profits. The site as I have considered it....would post financial data on each company, any political connections (campaign contributions/lobbyist activity, etc..], and pictures of board members.....hopefully sitting in front of a mansion for added effect!! My theory is that this will: 1. not be too inconvenient (for consumers) to raise a substantial boycott--we have to be realistic in peoples' efforts don't we?? 2. the idea of the "on deck" position, may hurt trading//stock prices--if this gains enough momentum 3. in line with that, seriously effect cash flow on a concentrated single front....for at least that entire quarter Obviously this is just another guy babbling, until the site is on the map....I would welcome any constructive feedback.....By the way in response to the other post...I just sold my Buick Regal (18-21mpg) and bought a Pontiac Vibe (30-35 mpg)...so I also believe in the other things you guys are saying....GOOD POST.....time for talk is DONE we need to DO. Matt B

[ Reply to This ]


Who's to Blame?[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#13)
by rdhalste on Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 03:42:39 PM PDT

One man's answer really isn't an answer at all. It might make him feel good, but it isn't the answer. It's a start in the right direction but based on the wrong reasoning. First we have to ask, how can "Big Oil" make such large profits? The answer is a simple one. Because *we* purchase so much! Pure, simple, straight; *We* are to blame. Smaller businesses could not get by on the oil company profit margins. They are very narrow, but they deal in such large quantities they make very good profits. If we, as individuals didn't have such an insatiable desire for gas and big cars, trucks, vans, and SUVs and IF we cut our driving by less than a third we would no longer have to depend on foreign oil, at least not for driving our cars. So, if we are going to blame any one it should be the one looking out of the mirror in the morning. As a side note, if alternative energy sources we hear so much about are to become an economically viable replacement for gas in cars the price of gas will need to go to at least $3.50 a gallon and stay there. Except on a small scale, or in geographic specific areas, alternative energy is expensive.

[ Reply to This ]


One man's answer to big oil | 12 comments (12 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:
Recent Entries
Bill Gates and PC history
21 comments

Borderline searches and seizures
15 comments

Reader voices: Angry at eBay
12 comments

Teleblend's terrible terms
2 comments

Spyware bill cloaks a mini-UCITA
9 comments

Reader Voices: Autorenewal Defenses
23 comments

More The Gripelog...

Submit a gripe
About the Author
Email Ed Foster

Help Ed and his readers build these projects:
The Gripewiki
The EULA Library

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Live Gripes
Has AOL Changed Their Ways?
12 comments

A Nestle SweeTarts Conspiracy
13 comments

AT&T Kills "Bad" Username
26 comments

DESPERATE! AOL HAS TAKEN OVER MY COMPUTER
47 comments

parkingticket.com SCAM on refunds
22 comments

Don't let Net Enforcers Ruin Your Day.
14 comments

More Live Gripes...

Sign up for my newsletter

To have my column automatically e-mailed to you, submit your email address in the form below. Of course, I will not turn your address over to any other party or send you any unrequested e-mail.

Infoworld Blogs

Recomended Sites
The AFFECT Coalition
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Free Software Foundation
HearUsNow.org
Public Knowledge
StopBadware.org

Jeff Angus
Ben Edelman
Dan Gillmor
Bob Lewis
Brian Livingston
Freedom to Tinker
Lawmeme
PC World's Techlog
SunBeltSoftware Blog
Troubleshootsers.com

Rss Feeds
How this works
 Top News 
 Columnists 
 Tech Watch 
 Test Center Reviews 
 Applications 
 App Development 
 E-Business Solutions & Strategies 
 End-user Hardware 
 Networking 
 Operating Systems 
 Platforms 
 Security 
 Standards & Protocols 
 Storage 
 Telecommunications 
 Wireless 
 Web Services 

 

create account | faq | search