Free Technology Newsletters
» All 33 InfoWorld Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily
 
InfoWorld
 
   

Certified and Restricted

By Ed Foster, Section The Gripelog
Posted on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 12:08:39 AM PDT

When you've got a real beef with a company, does it help to write a letter to the CEO? The GripeLog has heard testimony on both sides of that question, but one reader recently made an interesting point. If you're going go to the trouble of writing a company's big cheese, make sure you send the letter certified and restricted.


"A number of years ago I had some problems with a very large bank," the reader wrote. "My wife worked with another bank, so I got her to get me the name of the President/CEO/Chairman of the Board for the bank I had the problem with. I wrote a letter explaining the problem. Then I took advantage of a readily available but little utilized service from the United States Postal Service. I sent the letter Certified Mail with Restricted Delivery.

"With Restricted Delivery the specified person or authorized agent must sign the receipt for the item," the reader explained. "The authorized agent must be authorized in writing. You can imagine what happens when the postman shows up at Microsoft or in my case the main office of a major band and refuses to release the letter to anyone other than the addressee -- Bill Gates or the bank president. Eventually the letter gets signed for and it will be read. The response I got was a letter detailing the steps taken to correct the problems and an apology. The letter also included the office number and cell phone number of the president's administrative assistant with instructions to call if there was any further difficulty.

"I have used the restricted delivery option on several more occasions and although one problem did not get resolved the way I wanted it to, it has always gotten the attention of the party to whom it was sent," the reader added. "It has also always gotten an immediate response from the receiving party. It is amazing what knowing that not only does the person who sent the letter have proof that it was delivered, but also has proof that to whom it was delivered. It is real hard to state later in court that you have no knowledge of the situation when the other party has your signature on a receipt for the information in question. I have found the restricted delivery option to be cheap insurance when dealing with large organizations because I end up having an even larger organization - the U.S. government backing me up."

What's been your experience? Does it do any good to complain to the CEO, or is there a better way to get a problem with a company you do business with resolved? Post your comments below or write me directly at Foster@gripe2ed.com.

< SMS Spam With a Sneakwrap Twist | What Do the Feds Really Want From Google? >


Display: Sort:
Certified and Restricted | 15 comments (15 topical) | Post A Comment
What's to keep the CEO from rejecting the letter??[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:03:05 AM PDT

If I get something registered/certified mail and I don't know what it is, I generally reject accepting it. What keeps the busy CEO from doing that routinely? Without restricted authorization, there is at least a chance that someone of improtance will accept and read the letter.

[ Reply to This ]


Because...[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#3)
by CowboyinBRLA on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:16:27 AM PDT

While "ordinary people" may feel free to reject a certfied/restricted letter, the head of a company generally can't. It may be important legal papers (perhaps even a lawsuit against the company; some jurisdictions allow people to be served in this manner, and refusing service can result in a default judgment). It may be something critical like stock certificates or other documents which must be safeguarded.

No CEO is going to want to go before his board of directors and explain that he let a judgment happen against the company because he refused to accept delivery of a letter.

More importantly, most big-company CEO's are so insulated from customer complaints, a letter like this can be a real eye-opener. If he or she's used to being told everything is "just fine", the CEO is likely to (a) resent that someone working for him isn't doing his job right, and (b) insist that something be done. That is, if the CEO cares about the company's quality, which presumably a good one does.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]



The Good Old Days[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#2)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:12:45 AM PDT

In the good old days, you could just phone the executive offices and ask for the president. You didn't get him, but if you got his executive secretary your problems would get resolved in a hurry. I did it with Southern California Edison (1980) K-Mart (2000), and a division of Kodak (2000), as well as numerous small companies. Now, of course, the executives insulate themselves so it's almost impossible to phone the executive offices. But the bottom line is, if you find any way to get their attention like Ed's reader has suggested, it works like a charm! Executives hate being informed of problems, and it's easy for them to say "Fix It!" to subordinates.

[ Reply to This ]


You Betcha[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#4)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:25:00 AM PDT

When I have a problem with ANY item or service, I go right to the top! Customer service departments are good at getting you off of the phone. They will give you the minimum possible to make you happy again or just apologize that there is nothing they can do. My experience that writing to the CEO sending the letter overnight mail. There's nothing like a big letter showing up to get attention. I would say I have gotten over 80% satisfaction doing this. In the few cases that I have received no satisfaction from this process, I refuse to spend money for this brand ever again. I recently had occassion to to contact the CEO of a well known Japanese car maker after my car had a seat motor fail twice in less than three years. I felt that this was obviously a defective, or underdesigned component. Calling customer service got me nowhere, I wrote a letter to the CEO, and his office called me and also declined any financial assistance due to the fact that the car was out of warranty due to mileage. Needless to say, when we were replacing my wifes vehicle 3 weeks later, we did not even consider that brand. a $30,000 lost sale for that brand, and I told them that on the phone. But they did save that couple of hundred dollars on a warranty repair....

[ Reply to This ]


Intuit Makes it Easy & Effective[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#5)
by MikeBlockCPA on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:37:48 AM PDT

Email First_Name@intuit.com. For example, CEO Steve_Bennett@intuit.com, QuickBooks VP Brad_Smith@intuit.com or founder Scott_Cook@intuit,com. Scott invented usability tests by taking yellow pad notes as paid novice & experienced computer users tried to break pre-release Quicken. This let novices install it and print a check in 15 minutes, when experienced users needed an hour with competing programs. Top Intuit execs are still very eager to hear from anyone unhappy with products or service. Do other big companies fix products like QuickBooks a day after such an email?
Mike Block, QuickBooks CPA: Intuit paid me to make QuickBooks & TurboTax ProSeries better. http://www.blocktax.com
[ Reply to This ]


Really?[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#7)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 12:22:42 PM PDT

Top Intuit execs are still very eager to hear from anyone unhappy with products or service.


I'm assuming this is so that they can laugh at the pain their policies, products, and service cause their 'customers'. Seriously, looking at the complaints on this site and numerous others, as well as from personal experience, I haven't seen anything to indicate Intuit cares in the slightest about the quality of its products and its customers.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


I did this with Sprint and had to send it twice![ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#6)
by welkerdp on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 11:43:32 AM PDT

Several years ago I switched local phone service providers but Sprint kept billing me for providing LD on my old provider. After they ignored my regular letter I sent certified mail to the "VP Residential Long Distance" -- someone at Sprint signed for it and then sent it back unopened with a note saying they couldn't identify the recipient! So finally I looked up the name of the CEO or COO (I forget) and addressed my third letter to them personally. I didn't use restricted delivery, but my problem did get resolved in short order.

[ Reply to This ]


Sprint[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#11)
by Anonymous User on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 03:18:01 AM PDT

Its always better to have a name instead of a title. The title you referenced does not exist nor has it ever existed at Sprint. I'm not suprised the underpaid person in the Mailroom didn't know where to send it.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Certified is fine[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#8)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 01:17:22 PM PDT

Certified is fine; return receipt if you want proof of delivery. Restricted delivery will do nothing but annoy the recipient and ensure that after he signs for the letter he will turn it straight over to his secretary for filing by Top Men. The key is the cc the CFO and the Secretary of the Board on your letters; that makes it official corporate correspondence. sPh

[ Reply to This ]


Certified and Restricted[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#9)
by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 17, 2006 at 07:21:32 PM PDT

If you've got a beef and you owe the company money, then consider a personal check made out to the full name of the CEO with (all caps) "PERSONAL SIGNATURE REQUIRED". Supposedly such a check can only be endorsed by the CEO, who will probably want to see your accompanying letter. Since the CEO is an officer of the corporation, he or she is empowered to sign such checks on behalf of the firm. No judge is going to sit still for a silly argument that the CEO was too busy to be bothered endorsing your check.

[ Reply to This ]


Writing to the CEO may work, but...[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#10)
by Anonymous User on Wed Jan 18, 2006 at 01:21:09 PM PDT

Consumer letters to the office of the CEO either receive prompt attention, or they don't, depending on the company.

If the company does treat such letters seriously, your matter will receive prompt attention, no matter the delivery method. If they don't, "restricted delivery" will be a waste of postage.

Since you can authorize the post office to deliver your "restricted delivery" letter to an authorized representative (USPS DMM 503.7.4.1.a) , you can be quite sure that the CEO most certainly has authorized somebody else to pick up the mail and read it. I don't imagine that Bill Gates personally takes time out of his schedule every day to sign a stack of little green postcards. (Return Receipts)

Some companies will simply stick a consumer complaint letter addressed to the CEO into the circular file. Others will process each one of them by the CEO's staff. Lastly, some will just re-route the letter to the customer service dept.

If you plan on using the letter as evidence in court (or small claims court), you should most certainly send the letter Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. However, the restricted delivery option will not get you anything additional when sending to a company.

If you do not plan on using the letter as evidence, then simply send the letter first class mail. First Class Mail to a coporate officer WILL be read by SOMEBODY, although you may not get the response you want.

Do NOT follow the of the one of the anonymous posters and mail payments to the CEO. If you mail your payment to a different place than where you were supposed to, the company is perfectly justified in sticking your check into the circular file. (Or cashing it and having the money go into a black hole.)

As a side note, sending restricted delivery to the govt. is a COMPLETE waste of money under USPS regulations, which say pretty much that it can be ignored by govt. officials.

SirWired

[ Reply to This ]



Letter to CEO[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#12)
by Anonymous User on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 07:40:57 AM PDT

I was at a company when a letter was sent to the CEO complaining about software that was not innovative. This sparked a week long initiative where the entire department stopped working on normal projects in order to innovate a new product. If you reach a CEO who really cares, then things get done.

[ Reply to This ]


It worked for me.[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#13)
by Anonymous User on Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 09:51:39 AM PDT

A credit card bank charged me a $39 late fee on a $15 debt that was posted 1 day late (I assume due to postal mishandling because it was sent with plenty of time to arrive). The customer service department would not reverse the late fee and I refused to pay it. I got two more late fees ($39 each) on the unpaid late fee (remember, the $15 debt was already paid). I did not get relief until I wrote to the bank president, then all late fees were canceled. Then I promptly canceled that credit card.

[ Reply to This ]


How to DISCOURAGE good customer service[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#14)
by Anonymous User on Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 10:53:47 AM PDT

Anonymous User wrote ..
I did not get relief until I wrote to the bank president, then all late fees were canceled. Then I promptly canceled that credit card.
This is a perfect example of how NOT to encourage a company to treat consumers well. The company did you a favor by reversing the late fees that they were legally entitled to collect. Since you cancelled anyway, the person who fixed your problem was wasting his time, now looks like a fool, and will not do it again for the next guy with a problem. Thanks a bunch.

Mistakes happen. Bad judgment by CS reps happen. If the company resolves the issue, reward them by continuing to give your business. As an aside .. It isn't their fault is the USPS delayed your payment. The USPS is the organization that shouldn't get your business .. pay online!

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


I disagree[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#15)
by Anonymous User on Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 05:04:35 PM PDT

The problem should have been resolved easily at the first, or maybe second level of support. My wife has had no trouble getting our credit card company to cancel late fees a couple times when I was late getting a payment in by a couple days. In this case I think the parent took the correct action. Have them fix the problem, then let them know that their initial reaction was not acceptable behavior, by canceling the card. If a few consumers were active like this, then the division would take notice, and correct the real problem that the initial complaints aren't being resolved appropriately.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Certified and Restricted | 15 comments (15 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:
Recent Entries
Apple Leaves Hawaiian Investor in the Cold
2 comments

Riding the Autorenewal Express
8 comments

Comcast Gets Nominated for Worst ToS
3 comments

Taxing Software Experiences
12 comments

Terms of Ridicule
8 comments

Sneakwrapped Medical Forms
7 comments

More The Gripelog...

Submit a gripe
About the Author
Email Ed Foster

Help Ed and his readers build these projects:
The Gripewiki
The EULA Library

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Live Gripes
Has AOL Changed Their Ways?
4 comments

A Nestle SweeTarts Conspiracy
15 comments

AT&T Kills "Bad" Username
12 comments

DESPERATE! AOL HAS TAKEN OVER MY COMPUTER
28 comments

parkingticket.com SCAM on refunds
30 comments

Don't let Net Enforcers Ruin Your Day.
16 comments

More Live Gripes...

Sign up for my newsletter

To have my column automatically e-mailed to you, submit your email address in the form below. Of course, I will not turn your address over to any other party or send you any unrequested e-mail.

Infoworld Blogs

Recomended Sites
The AFFECT Coalition
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Free Software Foundation
HearUsNow.org
Public Knowledge
StopBadware.org

Jeff Angus
Ben Edelman
Dan Gillmor
Bob Lewis
Brian Livingston
Freedom to Tinker
Lawmeme
PC World's Techlog
SunBeltSoftware Blog
Troubleshootsers.com

Rss Feeds
How this works
 Top News 
 Columnists 
 Tech Watch 
 Test Center Reviews 
 Applications 
 App Development 
 E-Business Solutions & Strategies 
 End-user Hardware 
 Networking 
 Operating Systems 
 Platforms 
 Security 
 Standards & Protocols 
 Storage 
 Telecommunications 
 Wireless 
 Web Services 

 

create account | faq | search