Free Technology Newsletters
» All 33 InfoWorld Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily
 
InfoWorld
 
   

Reader Voices: SCO Suits

By Ed Foster, Section The Gripelog
Posted on Tue May 04, 2004 at 12:50:43 PM PDT

Reader response to my recent column on SCO confirmed something I already suspected: Companies that threaten customers with lawsuits on highly dubious grounds aren’t going to be very popular.


"This is absolutely outrageous," wrote one reader about the SCO filings against DaimlerChrysler and Autozone. "It was bad enough when they sued IBM and started making all those wild accusations about Linux being unconstitutional, but sending threatening letters to thousands of companies and trying to intimidate us into these bogus $699 licenses comes close to racketeering in my book. In fact, after these lawsuits are dismissed, the feds ought to seriously look at bringing RICO charges against SCO’s management."

Many readers were disturbed by the implications for IT operations of SCO’s lawsuits against customers. "If software that I buy is found to be infringing on the IP rights of others, does this mean that I am also liable?" mused one reader. "If I base my IT operations on such software will I have to give it up or pay a fine? You can sue anyone for anything. The question is whether or not you can win the type of suit SCO is threatening. If this is found to be the case, this industry will be in more trouble than I could have ever imagined."

"Society crossed a new line when Intellectual Property lawsuits turned into a line item in a company's profit sheet,’ wrote another reader. "What befuddles me, is that if a software company infringed in some other's code, or even someone in the Open Source community decides to do such, suddenly how does the un-suspecting user get infected with this? Imagine how far this could go. Have all these people gone mad?"

Not all the barbs were reserved for SCO, now that it’s known who was helping SCO raise financing for its legal escapades. "Isn't it as plain as the nose on your face that Microsoft is running the same jaded play from the same ol' playbook?" wrote one reader. "If you can't buy it, make it go away. Try litigation using a puppet company, figuring that if you tie this matter up in the courts for years, customers will shy away from UNIX/LINUX and stick to Microsoft. Fortunately, SCO has no leg to stand on and eventually, that effort will fail. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft then ends up doing full-scale marketing of an alternative UNIX based OS, dirt cheap, slick and easy to use, Linux APP. compatible, packed with many goodies, just to make LINUX go away. Sorry, Billy G., it ain't gonna happen. MS will eventually have to share the spotlight."

< Can-Spam Compliant Sneakwrap | Fair Terms >


Display: Sort:
Reader Voices: SCO Suits | 6 comments (6 topical) | Post A Comment
DaimlerChrysler's Response[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous User on Wed May 05, 2004 at 04:32:44 PM PDT

I like DaimlerChryler's response to SCO:  No one informed us you had rights to the software, the license agreement with ATT only requires us to say where we are using Unix, which is nowhere for the last seven years, and it doesn't say a thing about Linux, so you don't have a case.

DaimlerChrysler says they are surprised that SCO, now informed of the status of the software they asked about, hasn't gone away.  Of course, they know that SCO will argue Linux=Unix, but it does look like a very thin case, even by SCO standards.  This is a customer, using software products, not a software company that, in theory, might have developed Linux using Unix.

It has been entertaining - I've learned a bit about corporate law from this - but I'll sure be glad when SCO finally folds.

[ Reply to This ]



EULA text - gone![ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#2)
by Anonymous User on Wed May 05, 2004 at 07:12:30 PM PDT

Ed,

SCO was so enamoured of your recent column that the link you posted to the EULA:

http://www.caldera.com/scosource/eula.html

now returns:

Please contact your SCO sales representative for a current copy of the software license.

[ Reply to This ]



stupid fools[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#6)
by Anonymous User on Wed May 12, 2004 at 07:51:38 AM PDT

Not allowing a EULA to be publically accessible just begs the question of... are these people really the owners of anything, and what does the customer receive, or is entitled to within the terms of the licensing agreement? Acts such as this where they have publicly accessible information one minute, then they take it off and make it "private" unless asked in person with a check in hand, is completely ludicrous. Idiots oh yeah.. laura didio is a complete idiot as well! LOL

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Microsoft Funding[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#3)
by Anonymous User on Fri May 07, 2004 at 06:46:28 PM PDT

I believe I read something about the company Microsoft was using to fund SCO, Bluestar or something, has asked for their money back. Bet that will put SCO in a bind.

[ Reply to This ]


It's Baystar[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#4)
by Anonymous User on Sat May 08, 2004 at 08:09:23 AM PDT

It's Baystar, and they are. This has prompted the Royal Bank of Canada (the other member of the funding deal) to bail out also. What I hope to see is that this thing ends so badly for SCO that no one will dare try this stunt again for at least a generation.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Don't Be So Sure[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#5)
by Anonymous User on Mon May 10, 2004 at 09:56:13 AM PDT

According to an article on the Register today (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/07/bank_sells_sco_stock/) Baystar apparently thinks SCO should ditch the Unix business entirely and do nothing but file IP suits for its primary cash flow.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Reader Voices: SCO Suits | 6 comments (6 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:
Recent Entries
Bill Gates and PC history
21 comments

Borderline searches and seizures
15 comments

Reader voices: Angry at eBay
12 comments

Teleblend's terrible terms
2 comments

Spyware bill cloaks a mini-UCITA
9 comments

Reader Voices: Autorenewal Defenses
23 comments

More The Gripelog...

Submit a gripe
About the Author
Email Ed Foster

Help Ed and his readers build these projects:
The Gripewiki
The EULA Library

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Live Gripes
Has AOL Changed Their Ways?
12 comments

A Nestle SweeTarts Conspiracy
13 comments

AT&T Kills "Bad" Username
26 comments

DESPERATE! AOL HAS TAKEN OVER MY COMPUTER
47 comments

parkingticket.com SCAM on refunds
22 comments

Don't let Net Enforcers Ruin Your Day.
14 comments

More Live Gripes...

Sign up for my newsletter

To have my column automatically e-mailed to you, submit your email address in the form below. Of course, I will not turn your address over to any other party or send you any unrequested e-mail.

Infoworld Blogs

Recomended Sites
The AFFECT Coalition
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Free Software Foundation
HearUsNow.org
Public Knowledge
StopBadware.org

Jeff Angus
Ben Edelman
Dan Gillmor
Bob Lewis
Brian Livingston
Freedom to Tinker
Lawmeme
PC World's Techlog
SunBeltSoftware Blog
Troubleshootsers.com

Rss Feeds
How this works
 Top News 
 Columnists 
 Tech Watch 
 Test Center Reviews 
 Applications 
 App Development 
 E-Business Solutions & Strategies 
 End-user Hardware 
 Networking 
 Operating Systems 
 Platforms 
 Security 
 Standards & Protocols 
 Storage 
 Telecommunications 
 Wireless 
 Web Services 

 

create account | faq | search