Free Technology Newsletters
» All 33 InfoWorld Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily
 
InfoWorld
 
   

DRM Drums Grow Louder

By Ed Foster, Section Columns
Posted on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 09:12:35 AM PDT
Even as Intuit begins its advertising campaign to apologize for the TurboTax 2002 product activation debacle, readers are expressing frustration with the mounting number of software companies introducing DRM (Digital Rights Management) tools in their products.


Along with Symantec's Norton AntiVirus 2004, other vendors recently rolling out DRM include Adobe in Photoshop CS for Windows -- but not, interestingly enough, in PhotoShop CS for the Mac -- and Macromedia in its MX 2004 products. With Intuit's campaign serving as such a clear object lesson, readers had to wonder why these publishers were so willing to risk alienating their customers.

"Publishers, are you listening?" asked one ex-Symantec and ex-Macromedia customer. "When hacked versions of your software are available five minutes after release -- if not sooner -- product activation be damned, do you really think it will put a dent in piracy? Is it worth turning people like me away in the hopes of recouping a few dollars?"

"Software activation schemes are driving me insane," wrote an ex-Adobe and ex-Macromedia customer. "Like others before them, Adobe and Macromedia claim the scheme is beneficial to its customers and will present only a minor hassle. (But) I have been burned by activation several times in the past. The issues run the gamut: affecting system performance, not working properly with other applications, and having a properly authorized and paid for piece of software fail. This last one seems to usually occur when I'm in the remaining hours before I have to meet a deadline, thus giving evidence that Murphy's Law was somehow coded into the activation system."

If you read the vendors' own descriptions of their product activation plans and policies, it's clear they are quite conscious of Intuit's experience. Symantec even nervously brags about licensing "different technology than has been employed by some other companies" for its product activation. Adobe says it will permit re-activation on a second computer, and Macromedia goes so far as to offer a "License Transfer" feature to move from one computer to another.

But, in some ways, all the semi-apologetic reassurances by the vendors that their DRM is not going to be as bad as Intuit's just raises the question of why they feel compelled to do it at all. One way or another, they all acknowledge that product activation won't for a minute stop serious software pirates. Of course, if for whatever reason you have to re-activate one too many times, it's your tough luck if they decide you're a thief.

We should also remember that a year ago Intuit was saying many of these same things - pilot programs show users will love it, our support staff will generously and competently deal with all problems, our DRM is not spyware, etc. But by its very nature, DRM is a form of spyware. It puts customers in a position where they can only hope the software publisher will adhere to its promises as to how they will be treated, both now and in the future. That's the real rub of product activation. What Adobe, Macromedia and Symantec are saying - just as Intuit and Microsoft have said before -- is "Trust us, but don't expect us to trust you."

If the software industry didn't learn from TurboTax, I know I did. The only reason Intuit is having to make apologies today is because enough TurboTax customers complained about the problems they were having with product activation. With DRM coming so thick and fast, will we be able to track the problems customers have with it all? Let's talk about that next week.

--------------------

Post your comments about this column below or write me directly at Foster@gripe2ed.com. To receive this column every week in my free e-mail newsletter, please go to my subscription page and follow the instructions to opt-in for the EdFoster mailing list.

< Reader Voices: Eject, Eject! | PowerQuest Uses DRM in Some Products to Limit Use >


Display: Sort:
DRM Drums Grow Louder | 26 comments (26 topical) | Post A Comment
Too Late Intuit[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 09:47:07 AM PDT

Too late. I've already gone to another tax package. No product activation software for me--not even Windows XP. Amazing how much mileage I can get out of Win98

[ Reply to This ]


Tax software[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#9)
by Mason on Sun Oct 19, 2003 at 05:45:44 PM PDT

Same here -- I recently received a preorder notice from H&R Block for TaxCut.

It's a bit of a dilemma -- do you reward the company for "listening" to its customers and removing the activation?  If it were Macromedia or Adobe, then I might, but Intuit as a whole is so damn underhanded and frustrating as it is.

I think I'll stick with TaxCut this year and reward them for not using pulling the stunt in the first place.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]



Good luck with Win98[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#11)
by Anonymous User on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 11:19:06 AM PDT

Do you have a game plan in mind for when Microsoft drops support for Windows 98? Eventually there will come a time when you'll need to replace your OS and if future releases have authentication like XP's, what will you do?

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Alternatives[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#13)
by Anonymous User on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 11:47:34 AM PDT

There's Apple, Linux, Unix, BSD among others. There all always "patches" that an industrious individual can track down. After all, if an "Activation Crack" is good enough for a pirate, it's perfectly acceptable for someone who actually bought the product....

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Activation - Be damned.[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#15)
by Anonymous User on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 03:42:11 PM PDT

Hell, I'm still using NT 4.0 Wks. That is closer to demise (like man, it's done per MS) than is 98/98SE from MS's point of view, but 2000 with SP2 sounds good to me. And when 2000 requires upgrading to function on this planet - that could at least 6 - 10 years I suspect, and if MS still makes it impossible for me to run a functional OS without activating it, I will find the most recent code to bypass it. MS is making me do this IMHO. If that is not possible, I will go somewhere else. I change my hardware a lot compared to most business PC's and I simply will not deal with this crap and vote with my money when it comes to that stage. Adobe, et al, watch your sales. And then watch the pirated software make a pirouette upwards. Good luck to the idoiots that adopt this piss-poor design with fervor. Shift Key, here I come.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


"Support" -- Who cares?[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#16)
by Reziac on Thu Oct 23, 2003 at 09:34:52 AM PDT

Support now is a fairly meaningless term anyway, unless you're an enterprise with thousands of systems. If a setup is as old as Win95 and NT4, and is still running, obviously it doesn't really NEED "support", and it's apparently not being affected by anything that requires new patches, either.

People act like a program or OS stops working the day its support is dropped, but that's exactly what vendors encourage you to think -- because otherwise, they wouldn't sell an upgrade to those who are otherwise still perfectly happy with older software.

My two main boxes happen to run Win95 and Win98. I don't care if they're "supported" or not, so long as they still do the job I want them to do. Same with the apps I use. I happen to prefer an old browser and an old word processor, and both are good and dead to the world. But they still work and the concept of "support" has nothing to do with it.
~REZ~
[ Parent | Reply to This ]



amen bro <NT>[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#18)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 23, 2003 at 10:03:48 AM PDT



[ Parent | Reply to This ]


yes[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#24)
by maderikapapa on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 07:07:08 PM PDT

出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無 009;系サイト優良出会い系攻略 完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダル 488;サイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海 806;。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻コレクション風 439;告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメ 456;ロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチ 450;ニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画セックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセ 483;クス体位東京セックス仕方 SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板お 387;ぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳 522;示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫不倫を楽しみたい方にはお薦め 154;妻画像など満載出会いサイトを楽しむならココ無料出会いで一緒に遊ぼう出会いはLOVEアゲインで決まり

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


support? support?[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#17)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 23, 2003 at 10:02:27 AM PDT

I don't need no steenking support -- never have used MS support. There's tons of good support on the internet. (I'm still using WS6 BTW in dos and command windows in Win98, ME & Win2000 -- which does not require activation -- started using WordStar in--what? 1983?, 84?, who's counting? When the last time I got DOS support?) Ambiguity sorta rulz

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Bye Bye Intuit[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#19)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 23, 2003 at 10:24:30 AM PDT

I have also ceased purchasing Intuit products. My old Quicken works just fine for what I need. When it no longer works, I'll either write my own macros or get another program from another vendor. After my experiences with TurboTax and DRM, I won't purchase another product from Inutit.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Product Activation[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#2)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 10:37:54 AM PDT

It seems the only reason Microsoft can get away with product activation in Win XP is that there's no other viable option (for most people - let's leave Linux & Mac's out of this for now.) Intuit/Turbo Tax did not enjoy the same status because there are lots of reasonably priced, highly competitive alternatives. Although I don't use any products from Adobe (other than the PDF reader) or Macromedia, I'm pretty sure they (and Symantec) will soon find out they don't hold a monopoly in any of their respective markets either. At this point I'm not even sure Intuit is being completely honest - maybe this is all just a smoke-screen to hide the fact that they are just *changing* the DRM scheme to something else that they hope will be harder for the consumer to detect!

[ Reply to This ]


I no longer use Symantec products[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#7)
by haplo on Fri Oct 17, 2003 at 03:51:21 PM PDT

I have been a licensed user of Symantec's Systemworks for the past few years, but no longer.  When my Norton Antivirus expired from my Systemworks 2002 product, I considered purchasing Systemworks 2003, but decided against it.  For one thing, I am strongly against product activation.  For another, I do not consider the packages they include as all that much of an added value.

For my antivirus needs, I now use AVG's free antivirus product, and am considering purchasing their personal version, just to show my support for a reasonably decent product.  I also hope they'll use the money to improve their somewhat clunky user interface.  :-)

On the Mac side, I had purchased Systemworks 2.0, but have been burned by it repeatedly.  The antivirus software requires numerous patches to be compatible with OS X 10.2 (Jaguar), and don't even CONSIDER using Disk Doctor to repair a damaged (even slightly) drive.  More than likely, Disk Doctor will complete the damage by destroying ALL data and requiring a full OS reinstall to get things going again.  Being slow to learn sometimes, I had to reload the OS 3 times because of this useless application.

Thanks Symantec, but you're not seeing even $1 from me anymore.  I will look to free products or other vendors for my product needs.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]



yes[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#23)
by maderikapapa on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 06:41:31 PM PDT

出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無 009;系サイト優良出会い系攻略 完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダル 488;サイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海 806;。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻コレクション風 439;告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメ 456;ロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチ 450;ニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画セックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセ 483;クス体位東京セックス仕方 SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板お 387;ぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳 522;示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫不倫を楽しみたい方にはお薦め 154;妻画像など満載出会いサイトを楽しむならココ無料出会いで一緒に遊ぼう出会いはLOVEアゲインで決まり

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


yes[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#26)
by Anonymous User on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 06:08:02 AM PDT

無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画盗撮盗撮盗撮動画動画動画無料動画無料動画無料動画無料無料無料動画動画動画中出し中出し中出し動画動画動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料アダルト動画無料無料無料アダルトアダルトアダルト動画動画動画熟女熟女熟女動画動画動画ビデオビデオビデオエロ動画エロ動画エロ動画エロエロエロ動画動画動画エッチ動画エッチ動画エッチ動画エッチエッチエッチ動画動画動画無修正動画無修正動画無修正動画無修正無修正無修正動画動画動画

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Lamers at Macromedia[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#3)
by Spiffus on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 10:40:52 AM PDT

It's awfully nice of Macromedia to allow the product activators of MX 2004 to have a second, non-concurrent license for a laptop. However, people like me with Studio 4 are apparently out of luck. Even though my wife isn't going to fire up Dreamweaver 4 or Flash 5 anytime in the future, I'm supposed to uninstall Studio 4 from my desktop machine and load it on my laptop, and then reverse the process when I'm done? That's lame. No, thanks, Macromedia. I was considering updating my software someday, but since I'm a "second-class citizen" now because my software isn't the newest, I might as well stick with what I've got. Go get a couple hundred dollars from someone else.

[ Reply to This ]


Time limited license[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#4)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 10:48:45 AM PDT

This is also a way to limit usage of a version of a product in time. A few years from now, they can decide to turn off the activation server for an old version, and any user that need to reinstall that version will be left out in the cold, with the only option to update to a more recent version. It already happened to me with trial version of a software coming with a product I legally acquired. Less than 2 year later, I could no longer activate the trial, because the activation server no longer existed.

Also, even small company are getting into this. For example FireTrust, the maker of MailWasher Pro, a very good SPAM filter program, except for the activation scheme. I found out about the activation after I bought the product. Because it was part of a bundle with Zone Alarm Pro, I am now having difficulties to return it.

[ Reply to This ]



Who do they think they're kidding?[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#5)
by cparker on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 12:18:46 PM PDT

Just look at these quotes (and they're suspose to make me feel good?)! I don't think I'll be buying any of these products! Symantec says: "Product activation provides customers with assurance that they are purchasing authentic software from Symantec, which ensures the high level of quality, reliability, peace-of-mind, and ease-of-use they have come to expect from Symantec products." - Maybe so, but it does very little good if that actually happened. How am I going to get my money back from whom I purchased the "pirated" copy? Adobe says: "Adobe does not believe a customer-focused activation process represents a burden to the user. Adobe is fully committed to honoring the terms of its product license agreements. In the event that a product is discontinued, Adobe will enable automatic approval of all activation requests for that product or provide a means to remove activation outright. In either case, the customer will not experience any change in software capabilities." I guess Adobe has a different idea of what "burden" and "commitment" mean than I do! Macromedia says: "Users who wish to upgrade or change their system will find product activation very flexible. Once a product is activated, users can easily deactivate the current installation using a single menu item. The software can then be reactivated on a different machine." "Flexible"????? Like I'm really going to want to do that? What happens if my computer dies and I buy a new one?

[ Reply to This ]


What's in a Name?[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#6)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 16, 2003 at 02:03:57 PM PDT

It's been called many things in the past. Product Activation, Digital Rights Management - it's all just copy protection. All these companies were supposed to have learned their lessons about this from Lotus Development. Copy protection is a non starter for users. No matter how you dress it or what you call it. --A former Windows/NAV user, happy in Linux Land

[ Reply to This ]


Beat me to it[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#8)
by haplo on Fri Oct 17, 2003 at 03:58:48 PM PDT

I was going to reference the original DRM included with the DOS version of Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet.  If I remember correctly, it came with a license key floppy that gave you two activations.  If the floppy got lost or damaged, or you had 2 activations, and somehow both computers got damaged or destroyed, then getting Lotus to cooperate was somewhat difficult, as you couldn't really prove anything to them.

I remember that this got them into a lot of hot water with their customers, and made Borland's spreadsheet (can't remember it's name right now) that much more popular.

A few years ago, I purchased a Cisco emulator (for training on IOS) when I was considering studying for the CCNE certification.  It came with a floppy disk product activation scheme, that seemed pretty solid (meaning that you couldn't copy the floppy as a backup).  When I contacted them about what they would do should the floppy be damaged, or lost, and the software needed to be moved, they pretty much said that it wasn't their problem and that you'd have to re-purchase your license.  Not horribly surprising that their product was only accepted in niche groups.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]



Re: Beat me to it[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#10)
by dliesse on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 10:55:47 AM PDT

For what it's worth, Borland's product was Quattro. Never used it myself, but heard nothing but good things about it from those who did.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Quattro/Lotus Copy Protection[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#14)
by Anonymous User on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 01:12:31 PM PDT

DOS version of Quattro was a wonderful product (I still use it for a few things under W98). But it came out long after Lotus got the message and dropped the copy protection. During that Lotus uproar I remember PC Magazine (which was more influential then) declaring they wouldn't give an Editor's Choice to any product with copy protection. I wonder if they will apply that standard to thier beloved Micro$oft.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


yes[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#25)
by maderikapapa on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 07:32:28 PM PDT

出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無 009;系サイト優良出会い系攻略 完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダル 488;サイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海 806;。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻コレクション風 439;告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメ 456;ロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチ 450;ニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画セックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセ 483;クス体位東京セックス仕方 SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板お 387;ぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳 522;示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫不倫を楽しみたい方にはお薦め 154;妻画像など満載出会いサイトを楽しむならココ無料出会いで一緒に遊ぼう出会いはLOVEアゲインで決まり

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


But activation is so easy, hardly takes 5 minutes[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#12)
by Anonymous User on Tue Oct 21, 2003 at 11:22:10 AM PDT

My answer to that shibboleth is: I use approximately 40 applications on a regular basis, if my computer dies, or I make substantial hardware changes to trigger re-authentication, am I supposed to go through 40 authentication procedures? No thank you. Any product placing such a burden on my time I can certainly live without.

[ Reply to This ]


Product Activation: vote with your wallet[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#20)
by Anonymous User on Thu Oct 30, 2003 at 09:10:10 AM PDT

As an "owner" of many software packages I am becoming very concerned with this trend towards product activation schemes that are annoying and cumbersome to live with. I have always purchased all the software I use. I always upgraded to the latest version when it became available. Unfortunately, problems with activation schemes has forced me to stop upgrading or purchasing software that severely restricts the way I work. I simply refuse to reward companies for making my life more difficult.

One problem with activation is that I routinely work on three different systems depending on where I am, and what I need to do. These schemes do not permit using the software this way. I'm supposed to purchase a separate license for each system I need to work with! As an individual home-user with thousands of dollars worth of software that I use regularly, I simply cannot afford to do this. (divorce for sure) Since flexibility is more important to me and the way I work, I'd rather stay with older software that works with me instead of switching to the new software that will only create more problems to deal with. The main problem here is that all these new licensing schemes tie the software to a computer rather than the individual that has purchased it. I'd have a much easier time living with activation if it was licensed to me and followed me to each system I worked on.

Another problem with current activation schemes is that they become a hassle to manage if you want to move it to another system or upgrade your hardware. While it's true that some schemes enable you to migrate your license to other systems, I have found that this ends up providing just enough friction to reduce how often I work with the software. One example is Discreet's 3dsmax animation package. 3dsmax is a terrific tool and a very expensive software package that took a major stretch for me to purchase. (it's worth every penny) However, the activation scheme it uses restricts use to a single system at a time. They provide a license manager tool that enables you to export or e-mail the license to another system. At first glance this seems good. However, the reality is that more often I don't realize I need to use the tool until I am at a different system and then I can't use it since the license was not transferred ahead of time. So I end up not using it the way I had intended. Of course the simple solution to this problem is to buy another license, but at $3500/system I won't be doing that anytime soon. So I end up using cheaper packages that don't work as well, but can be installed on the systems I work with.

In the end, as a fellow software developer I can understand the need to protect intellectual property. But as a consumer, I am becoming increasingly frustrated with the schemes being used to do it. I don't feel that I should be penalized for wanting to use the software I purchase how and where I want to. I certainly don't like trusting companies to "permit" me to use something I have already paid for, when they don't trust me back. This may be a lost cause, but until my software stops working or until these policies change, I am going to vote with my wallet and not buy or upgrade software that is sold this way.

--End Rant.

p.s. My favorite tools are from Macromedia and Adobe and while it pains me to do it, I'm not uprading Photoshop, StudioMX, Acrobat, Premiere, or AfterEffects due to the new activation schemes.

[ Reply to This ]


So Long, Symantec/Peter Norton, Old Friend[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#21)
by Hominid on Tue Nov 11, 2003 at 03:25:02 PM PDT

Having been a corporate IT manager and developer since 1986, I've been through the first (PC) copy-protection fiasco and I thought all vendors had learned a lesson as a result of consumer and corporate response to it. I think they did, but those old-time CEO's who learned the hard way are probably retiring or retired and their smart-assed baby-boomer replacements need to be taught the same lesson. The lesson is: No matter what you call it and how you structure it, DRM/Copy Protection was devised by humans and will be circumvented by humans, given a very short period of time. No matter how smart the creator(s) there will be found smarter destroyers. DRM be damned! It's simply a desperate, fruitless effort to fatten the bottom line. It is an irritant and insult to the consumer which will not work in the long term! Using a keyboard, I work at work and I work at home on work work, plus I work on work work while on the road for work. In doing such work, I, too, have always paid for all software I've used, but I have always been grateful to the vendor who started the same-person, multiple-PC concept (I think it was Phillipe Kahn, founder of Borland) which allowed me to have a single license that covered my desktop at work, my desktop at home, and more recently my dreaded (chain-me-to-the-job) laptop. Buying three licenses to do this is just out of the question! Peter Norton was a hero to me in the earlier days because he created excellent, common-sense stuff and I bought a lot of it over the years. Besides writing terrific software, his business practices and philosophies always favored the user. Now Symantec is killing all that. So, I won't be paying Symantec (or anybody else) three-times-over for any more software whether it is Peter Norton's or someone else's because now there are other vendors of similar stuff who have not (at least, yet) jumped on the DRM bandwagon. They still allow me one license to use their software at the three posts I am chained to on a daily basis and I'll buy their stuff, happily. I won't even discuss M$. Dropping them is a given and Linux is going to hurt them BADLY ... Yay! Hang in there, folks ... DRM will die, just like the last time, because we will kill it with our (personal and corporate) wallets. End of tirade.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Product Activation[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#22)
by DaleFuller on Wed Nov 12, 2003 at 06:43:42 AM PDT

I've also been doing what your anonymous writer has been doing... I ignore software updates (and many hardware upgrades). I work at finding other ways to do what I used to do on a PC. But lately, I've taken it one step farther. My PC increasingly sits unused in my home office. I check e-mail on my cell phone, I've gone back to my trusty paper Day Runner (yes, those things are still made), and I've learned how to amuse myself with real things and places that actually exist. Imagine what it would say to software and hardware companies if we all took a little step backwards and dropped our PC usage down a notch or two... or even quit using them for some things?!?!? But maybe I'm just some sort of nut...

[ Reply to This ]


DRM Drums Grow Louder | 26 comments (26 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:
Recent Entries
A few things
2 comments

Thank you
14 comments

Ed Foster: 1949-2008
73 comments

Dell notebook turns into a Bad Buy
8 comments

Of Apple, Psystar users, and copyright
6 comments

The suspicious death of XP support
29 comments

More The Gripelog...

Submit a gripe
About the Author
Email Ed Foster

Help Ed and his readers build these projects:
The Gripewiki
The EULA Library

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Live Gripes
Has AOL Changed Their Ways?
8 comments

A Nestle SweeTarts Conspiracy
19 comments

AT&T Kills "Bad" Username
35 comments

DESPERATE! AOL HAS TAKEN OVER MY COMPUTER
55 comments

parkingticket.com SCAM on refunds
33 comments

Don't let Net Enforcers Ruin Your Day.
19 comments

More Live Gripes...

Sign up for my newsletter

To have my column automatically e-mailed to you, submit your email address in the form below. Of course, I will not turn your address over to any other party or send you any unrequested e-mail.

Infoworld Blogs

Recomended Sites
The AFFECT Coalition
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Free Software Foundation
HearUsNow.org
Public Knowledge
StopBadware.org

Jeff Angus
Ben Edelman
Dan Gillmor
Bob Lewis
Brian Livingston
Freedom to Tinker
Lawmeme
PC World's Techlog
SunBeltSoftware Blog
Troubleshootsers.com

Rss Feeds
How this works
 Top News 
 Columnists 
 Tech Watch 
 Test Center Reviews 
 Applications 
 App Development 
 E-Business Solutions & Strategies 
 End-user Hardware 
 Networking 
 Operating Systems 
 Platforms 
 Security 
 Standards & Protocols 
 Storage 
 Telecommunications 
 Wireless 
 Web Services 

 

create account | faq | search