INFOWORLD GRIPE LINE BY ED FOSTER Bookmark this page

  
Display: Sort:
Bill Gates and PC history | 27 comments (27 topical) | Post A Comment
Your column underestimates Microsoft's abusiveness[ Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#7)
by Futurepower tm on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:48:16 AM PDT

Ed,

That's the worst column you have ever written, in my opinion. You have vastly, vastly underestimated how much Microsoft's abusive practices were the cause of it's "success".

There are so many abuses that it is impossible to mention them all here. There is "embrace, extend, extinguish". That just happened to the database language xBase, because Microsoft discontinued FoxPro.

There was the apparent lying to IBM about Microsoft's support for OS/2.

Another example: Back before Windows 95 was released, I got very irritated at Microsoft. There were only two ways to buy DOS. You could be a big computer maker, or you could buy an illegal, pirated copy from one of the six distributors in this area. Apparently that was an attempt to give the big computer makers a monopoly. I called the Microsoft legal department, and gave my complaints to someone who was apparently new there. She took the complaint, and that apparently forced Microsoft to take one of the pirates to court. I was a witness. But, to my knowledge, Microsoft never did allow smaller system builders to buy legal copies of DOS. Last time I checked, Microsoft had made it impossible to talk to anyone in the legal department.

Another example: At one time the top three word processors were: 1) Microsoft Word, for lots of money, 2) Microsoft Word, pirated, for $50, and 3) whatever was in 3rd place. My experience of Microsoft, and my opinion, is that Microsoft encouraging or allowing piracy of its products was a big factor in causing Microsoft products to become so "popular". It certainly wasn't excellence. It was, in my opinion, adversarial behavior.

[ Reply to This ]


Not quite[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#11)
by sconeu on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 08:08:47 AM PDT

From DOS 1.0 through 4.0, you could not "legally" buy a copy of DOS off the shelf.

Microsoft changed that with DOS 5.0.  

--
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the United States of America.
[ Parent | Reply to This ]



Not much need[ Parent | Reply to This ] (none / 0) (#19)
by Anonymous User on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 10:30:38 AM PDT

During that timeframe, all PCs were required to be shipped with an OS and almost always it was MSs. If you needed a specific version of the OS, it was sitting on a PC next to you and there were millions of copies on floppies that you could just load onto your machine.

[ Parent | Reply to This ]


Bill Gates and PC history | 27 comments (27 topical) | Post A Comment
Display: Sort:

Menu
· create account
· faq
· search

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HOME  NEWS  COLUMNS  BLOGS  PODCASTS  TECHNOLOGIES  TEST CENTER  EVENTS  CAREERS  IT EXEC-CONNECT   About Awards Contact Us 

Copyright © 2006, Reprints, Permissions, Licensing, IDG Network, Privacy Policy.
All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses,
phishing, worms, firewalls, security, servers, storage, networking, wireless, databases, and web services.

 ComputerWorld :: LinuxWorld :: Network World :: CIO :: PC World :: Darwin :: CMO :: CSO
IT Careers :: JavaWorld :: Macworld :: Mac Central :: Playlist :: GamePro :: GameStar :: Gamerhelp
ITWorld Canada :: Computerwoche :: Techworld UK :: tecChannel :: IDG.se :: IDG.no :: IDG.pl

create account | faq | search